That Ruby2.0 depends on Ruby1.9.1 isn't as much the problem as the fact that when Ruby2.0 is installed, it is not the default ruby; ruby1.9 is. That, to me, is completely baffling.
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Daniel Muller <1310...@bugs.launchpad.net>wrote: > The problem seems to be in the fact that "ruby2.0" depends on "ruby", > which depends on "ruby1.9.1". > I rebundled the package without the dependencies to "ruby" and > "rubygems-integration": https://launchpad.net/~spuul/+archive/ruby2.0 > > I removed the dependency to libjs-jquery too (I am unclear why this > dependency exists) and added the alternatives symlinks. > > Is there a way to provide a trusty-updates for this package? I am > unclear how this would work. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a > duplicate bug report (1313864). > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1310292 > > Title: > installing `ruby2.0` results in ruby 1.9.3-p484 as default version > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby2.0/+bug/1310292/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1310292 Title: installing `ruby2.0` results in ruby 1.9.3-p484 as default version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby2.0/+bug/1310292/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
