When someone wants to use Qt Creator, it is extremely counterintuitive, that the package "qtcreator" is the wrong choice.
I'd say the package qtcreator should be renamed to qtcreator-base (or something similar) and then there should be a new meta package "qtcreator" which is dependent on qtcreator-base and qttools5-dev (and maybe others). It should provide everything that is necessary for typical usage of Qt Creator. On Linux Mints package manager, "qt-sdk" is quite far down the list when searching for "qt" and not even on the list when searching for "qtcreator" or "qt creator" (as a side note, the search for "qt creator" doesn't even list the package "qtcreator") -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qtcreator in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316981 Title: package "qtcreator" needs to be dependent on "qttools5-dev" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtcreator/+bug/1316981/+subscriptions -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
