Alright so I was wrong on the last count it's actually. -> SearchCell -> The last else statement -> aCol[nCol].SetString(nRow, nTab, aString, pDocument->GetAddressConvention()); -> aNewCell.release(*this, nRow); (In SetString, column3.cxx) -> ScCellValue::release (cellvalue.cxx), it falls to default in the switch -> rColumn.Delete(nRow); -> ScColumn::Delete( SCROW nRow ) (column3.css) Final in LibO - maCells.set_empty(nRow, nRow); Which is actually defined in mdds
[1] Link to before the commits that changes this around for reference: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/sc/source/core/data/column3.cxx?id=b139f6fedfcf3cbed0eadeb007e2155b576413d2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1342175 Title: [upstream] Poor performance with find & replace with empty value on large data set To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1342175/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
