Please Seth could you be more clear? I can't see the difference when an admin sets a default+access acl to some directory to grant write to a group, he knows what he does. Furthermore, imagine the admin is been under so heavy load so that he didn't got time enough to regrant the group write perm to newly copied data when such a mail comes with the attached file arrives... then what???? only the new data of group members others than the recipient would survive. Then what would you think of such an admin? He didn't backed up. Should he never use chmod g+sw at all ? And what prevents a user to destroy its own past contribution to a group team, killing the job of the whole team? Sorry but not being native english, maybe I missed subtleties in your post.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1376443 Title: Default ACL not inherited as Access ACL on copy and move To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/1376443/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
