On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 09:32:58PM -0000, dann frazier wrote: > > Yeah, I logged a bug in the lshw tracking system (which is moderated, > > so it's not publicly visible yet). I also intend to raise it on > > bugs.debian.org (Jessie can still crash the Mustang boards, and I'm > > thinking the powerpc port will also be potentially risky). > > Yeah, I've got a bug open in Debian (#740034), I certainly don't mind > if you add your patch there since it is still open. Actually, I need > to increase the severity now since arm64 is part of the archive.
Added. > >> I'd suggest opening a separate bug in LP to enable this class of > >> systems. This bug is at the end of it's lifecycle, and reopening it > >> would cause confusion. Would you mind doing that or should I? > > > > I don't mind, but as always I am slightly unsure of what level of > > severity I should raise it at. > > Well, if it is negatively impacting shipping hardware (i.e. lshw is > unable to report certain things because of the lack of smbios > support), I'd say "High" since I consider that a hardware enablement > issue. If it's just a correctness thing at this point, my opinion > would be wishlist. That's just my opinion though, feel free to use > your own judgment. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lshw/+bug/1388262 raised. And I don't have access to set severity anyway, so I'll leave that up to you :) Consider this ticket closed. / Leif -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1284406 Title: lshw can crash arm64 systems To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lshw/+bug/1284406/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs