I'm wondering why you added all those libFLAC.so.8 symbols to the libflac++6 symbol file, seems quite unneeded. It appears you used all the common symbols + the 32bit specific ones? Is that any better than just using the common symbols or some other solution? On 02/22/2015 01:42 PM, Phil Pratt-Szeliga wrote: > Possible fix [1] updates symbol files of libflac++6. This problem is > from libflac converting long to long long. On a 32bit system long will > evaluate to int32 and on 64bit it will evaulate to int64. The change by > libflac is attempting to make the values int64 on all architectures. > > If the libflac++6 symbols change, what repercussions does this have to > the rest of the packages? Maybe just reverting the libflac long longs to > long would be the best fix. > > [1] https://code.launchpad.net/~pcpratts/ubuntu/vivid/flac/fix-for- > ftbfs/+merge/250557 >
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1409483 Title: FTBFS: (package) on 32 bit arch's To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1409483/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
