Public bug reported:

'man resize2fs' claims "If no units are specified, the units of the size
parameter shall  be the filesystem blocksize of the filesystem" but
makes no mention of the units used in the minimum size report. The tool
itself makes no mention of units.

Many users would assume the value was in bytes, or possibly KB.

Despite the fact that the operating deals in file-system block-size
units the output appears to be in units of 512-byte sectors.

$ sudo dumpe2fs /dev/fujiVG/home | grep 'Block size'
dumpe2fs 1.42 (29-Nov-2011)
Block size:               4096

$ sudo resize2fs  -P /dev/fujiVG/home
resize2fs 1.42 (29-Nov-2011)
Estimated minimum size of the filesystem: 5124061

$ df /home
Filesystem              1K-blocks    Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/fujiVG-home  30963708 2438852  26952120   9% /home
$ df -B 4096 /home
Filesystem              4K-blocks   Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/fujiVG-home   7740927 609713   6738030   9% /home
$ df -B 512 /home
Filesystem              512B-blocks    Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/fujiVG-home    61927416 4877704  53904240   9% /home

** Affects: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1494625

Title:
  12:04: resize2fs: unclear/incorrect units in size report

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1494625/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to