I'm fine with putting everything under /opt as well, I simply picked /usr because other parts of the documentation (manpages) already shipped under /usr --- if we should ship under /opt, then it's perfectly doable but we should ship *everything* in /opt paths (this includes /var/opt or /etc/opt as appropriate). In this sense, it seems to be your "proposal 1" would work.
If you already have the packaging, could you send it to me (or attach it here) so I could look at it and figure out why lintian is unhappy? Also, should changing PM_HOME to point to the new directory instead of /var/perf/pm work instead of creating symlinks? The issue we have is specifically with adding directories or files that don't match any FHS spec. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1448092 Title: [needs-packaging] ibmpmlinux To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1448092/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
