Very snarky, Mike. I hope it's just snarky enough to finally get the good and serious attention that this repository misdirection for Fotoxx has lacked for years.
Others: Please, please, correct this pain-inducing misdirection. Fotoxx is so good that Ubuntu should want to feature it. At least, don't continue to advertise significantly years-old versions that no longer can perform well, instead of the nifty current versions. Mike Cornelison will aim you at the source for your repository. Thanks as always for what you do to make Ubuntu good; fixing this error will greatly help. Sincerely, --Dick Miller, Partner, Miller Microcomputer Services <themill...@millermicro.com <mailto:themill...@millermicro.com>> Co-Leader, FOSS User Group at Natick Community-Senior Center <http://millermicro.com/FOSSUserGroupNatick.html><http://millermicro.com/newURL.html> On 11/21/2015 03:36 AM, Mike Cornelison wrote: > "confirmed" and "unassigned" apparently forever. Cool system you have > here. > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1336808 Title: old version of Fotoxx in repositories is mislabeled as current version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fotoxx/+bug/1336808/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
