HI Steve, Correct. I would personally think that keeping only powerpc-ibm-utils is the better. Even better to rename it to powerpc-utils, after it is the only one.
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Steve Langasek <steve.langa...@canonical.com> wrote: > The code we want to pull in is definitely the code shipped under the > powerpc-ibm-utils package name. But there's also been discussion of > taking over the powerpc-utils package name, so we really should be > making one change or the other. > > ** Changed in: powerpc-utils (Ubuntu) > Status: New => Triaged > > ** Changed in: powerpc-utils (Ubuntu) > Assignee: Taco Screen team (taco-screen-team) => Adam Conrad (adconrad) > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527376 > > Title: > ubuntu-minimal and grub-ieee1275 depends powerpc-utils other than > powerpc-ibm-utils > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/powerpc-utils/+bug/1527376/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527376 Title: ubuntu-minimal and grub-ieee1275 depends powerpc-utils other than powerpc-ibm-utils To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/powerpc-utils/+bug/1527376/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
