(In reply to comment #26) > No. It was implemented in April this year, shortly before the gcc-5 release. > I've pointed out compatibility issue immediately: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg00153.html (...) > The were no behavioral changes at all after that patch went in.
In the Linaro thread, Jim points out to the abi_tag patch from 2012. Your mention is about "significant changes to attribute abi_tag". I can't see how I was wrong. > No gcc-5 doesn't default to C++11 and the issue here has nothing to do with > C++98 vs. C++11. > > Please try to get the facts strait, before posting long misleading replies. This is what most of the documentation, email threads and conversations I had seem to point at. If you have a different opinion, than by all means, please share your knowledge. Saying "it has nothing to do with" doesn't explain what it has to do with. I'm happy to be proven wrong here, as long as we get all the facts on the table. This bug doesn't seem to provide strong facts either. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1488254 Title: clang++ no longer ABI-compatible with g++ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/llvm/+bug/1488254/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
