------- Comment From roes...@de.ibm.com 2016-02-19 05:14 EDT------- (In reply to comment #7) > I'm not sure new wording is that much better. Maybe adding a training colon > would help: > > with possibly showing the cursor too? (not sure, but cursor maybe especially > disabled).
I guess this would be an improvement, yes. It would still be more obvious if you had "enter passphrase" in there somewhere. But maybe this is only my opinion :-) > I do appreciate testing LUKS encrypted volumes on s390x, however it is only > a protection for physically insecure devices. I am struggling to identify a > usecase in which mainframe and mainframe storage has zero physical security > to access it. OK understood. But should the encryption support (LUKS and ecryptfs) then not be removed completely or only be a hidden option? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1546144 Title: LUKS Unlock prompt should be reworded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/1546144/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
