On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 3:00 AM, bugproxy <bugpr...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> ------- Comment From thorsten.di...@de.ibm.com 2016-03-01 03:58 EDT------- > (In reply to comment #19) > > As already promised, I will continue some long term tests (cable pull and > > other path loosing scenarios) on a 4.4.0-8 system with > > multipath-tools_0.5.0+git1.656f8865-4 and kpartx_0.5.0+git1.656f8865-4. > > Results should be available by tomorrow. > > Results show, that this combination does not harm, instead it solves the > subject problem, even after 100 cycles. > > Ryan, but it's up to you what you are going to integrate to fix this > bug. > Thorsten, Thanks for the thorough testing of the scenarios. I'm currently examining the changes introduced into the newer Debian package and looking at which changes we'd need to fix this bug and also understand if a merge of the package makes more sense. Ryan > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical > Server Team, which is a bug assignee. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1540407 > > Title: > multipathd drops paths of a temporarily lost device > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1540407/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1540407 Title: multipathd drops paths of a temporarily lost device To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1540407/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
