Public bug reported:
The fontconfig files 65-fonts-arphic-ukai.conf and 65-fonts-arphic-
uming.conf are Ubuntu specific. Why do we ship those, considering that
the default font for Chinese is neither "AR PL UKai" nor "AR PL UMing"?
The files seem to make it more difficult to fix a sensible default
configuration for Chinese/Japanese rendering under a non-CJKV locale.
Currently we try to compensate for it via 64-language-selector-
prefer.conf.
Shouldn't 65-fonts-arphic-ukai.conf and 65-fonts-arphic-uming.conf be
dropped?
** Affects: fonts-arphic-ukai (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: fonts-arphic-uming (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: fonts-arphic-ukai (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1560548
Title:
Redundant fontconfig files
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-arphic-ukai/+bug/1560548/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
