I tried stripping my 1.6 based build, and it seems to be working. (Juju does reflection at init() time as part of some of the registries), so it seems safe to do. On the flip side it isn't amazingly better. It seems to be a bit less than 2:1. (73MB down to 40MB.) Almost certainly still worth it, just doesn't compensate for the 1:10 growth of the Juju binary itself over time.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564662 Title: Juju binaries should be stripped To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1564662/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
