It turns out that if I answer "no" to the first question, it only asks me about using an existing bridge. I leave the default lxcbr0, then I get networking back in containers.
So *if* lxcbr0 exists, I suggest using that by default in lxd -- I can't imagine a situation where you would *not* want to use that bridge and instead the non-working unconfigured network by default. And if lxcbr0 does not exist, could debconf have a mode to just set up lxdbr0 with default values like we used to have for lxcbr0? And maybe allow customization with -plow and followup questions if you say "no" to "configure the default LXD bridge"? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567440 Title: debconf for bridge configuration is confusing and too complicated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxd/+bug/1567440/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
