I don't see documentation about this either, subscribing Tyler and Jamie. I also don't think it's adequate to make lightdm depend on fcitx, as that's both just one input method amongst several (and most people don't need it), so I think the cleanest way might be to actually move the fcitx rules into lightdm. I figure fcitx itself won't need apparmor rules as it runs as user, and these were added only for the benefit of the lightdm greeter?
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1581187 Title: AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/lightdm-guest-session in /etc/apparmor.d/lightdm-guest-session at line 14: Could not open 'abstractions/fcitx' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1581187/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
