On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:47:20PM -0000, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Oh, maybe the test case is wrong. This SRU is the same fix as was done > in Debian's 5.1.1 (present in Xenial) to "not ship broken symlinks". > > See https://bugs.debian.org/732272 and comment #2
Different considerations apply to the development release, of course. But if that is what is proposed to be done in Trusty, why is the SRU needed at all? This "fix" won't solve anything for the user, will it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1337898 Title: Invalid symlinks for libungif.so and libungif.a To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/giflib/+bug/1337898/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
