Not a bug as such as far is the software is concerned, but I wonder if confusion could be avoided if the port number value in the config file matched the actual default.
As well as the Linux Format article (above), http://www.debianhelp.co.uk/darkstat.htm also gives wrong information. At least the right default in the config file would give a clue :) Just out of interest, has the default port ever been :666? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699374 Title: localhost:666 connection refused error? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/darkstat/+bug/1699374/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
