1. Who's the person in Maintainer that doesn't seem to be you nor "ubuntu developers" as customary? 2. can debhelper compat level be the last? 3. same for Standards-Version? 4. Vcs-* fields point to the upstream repository instead of the packaging one 5. please rename debian/docs following the package name, it *does* cause a lot of confusion to people not used to it to discover that it's not installed where they would expect it… 6. in d/rules please move that --buildsystem option to the main dh options instead of repeating it everywhere 7. also in d/rules please consider removing those unused code commented out, and removing that $(DHFLAGS) that is used only one 8. why do you call dh_strip manually, in only few packages? is dh_strip doing it wrong by itself? 9. why isn't the library in an appropriately named libary package, as all library should be? Installing a library in an application package doesn't sound like a good idea at all; you also overrode a lintian tag about this without giving a single comment. 10. lintian also contains some suggestion that you should definitely follow; please run a full lintian (with pedantic enabled); I'm mostly referring to the tags related to the binaries descriptions 11. d/copyright doesn't have a paragraph for 'Files: *'; whilst in itself is not a problem lintian highlights how you are not covering the 'LICENSE' file itself; probably the first paragraph should be turned into 'Files: *'
Note that I didn't do a copyright check of the package. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699333 Title: [needs-packaging] vala-panel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntubudgie/+bug/1699333/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs