On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Robie Basak <1640...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:30:14PM -0000, Nish Aravamudan wrote: >> The logic of the scripts seems sound to me. Do you want me to do the >> individual reviews of each branch as well in this case? > > Could you review what I put in the branches, please? That is: that the > backport contents are suitable in your opinion, and that I haven't > missed anything that might make it inappropriate for SRU - IOW, would > you be happy to sponsor these?
Reviewed: - python-acme/rbasak-guest/xenial - python-acme/rbasak-guest/yakkety - python-acme/rbasak-guest/zesty - python-certbot/rbasak-guest/xenial - python-certbot/rbasak-guest/yakkety - python-certbot/rbasak-guest/zesty - python-certbot/rbasak-guest/xenial-transitional - python-letsencrypt-apache/rbasak-guest/xenial - python-letsencrypt-apache/rbasak-guest/yakkety - python-letsencrypt-apache/rbasak-guest/zesty - python-letsencrypt-apache/rbasak-guest/xenial-transitional - python-letsencrypt-nginx/rbasak-guest/xenial - python-letsencrypt-nginx/rbasak-guest/yakkety - python-letsencrypt-nginx/rbasak-guest/zesty These all look good to me. Excellent work on a very complicated series of changes that all need to land together and I think they are suitable for uploading. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640978 Title: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-acme/+bug/1640978/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
