Thank you for submitting the bug and uploading the fix!

Could we please make sure that the [Impact] field of a bug is used to
nicely outline the impact the bug has on users? Without specific
knowledge of the package itself it's hard for an SRU reviewer to see the
actual impact of the bug and how important the fix is - and these we use
to determine if a fix/change is worth the risk of including it in a
stable release.

For instance here the [Impact] field is completely meaningless (the
title doesn't give too much info for me) - I get some overview when
seeing the patch description in the proposed upload, but this should be
present here. If I would accept it the way it is, another SRU member
that would like to release this change into -updates would have issues
getting an overview of the impact.

Please update the bug description appropriately. The SRU template is
there for something. I know it might sometimes look like that but it's
not just useless paperwork that needs to be copy-pasted blindly.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614054

Title:
  [SRU] Incorrect host cpu is given to emulator threads when
  cpu_realtime_mask flag is set

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1614054/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to