Launchpad has imported 14 comments from the remote bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473494.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-11-28T20:22:46+00:00 Christophe wrote: Created attachment 325037 lshw log Description of problem: dmraid crashes with a malloc(): memory corruption message Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): dmraid-1.0.0.rc15-2.fc10.x86_64 dmraid-libs-1.0.0.rc15-2.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: always happens on my system: Gigabyte P35C-DS3R 64 bits with 4 disk on the intel ICH9 controller the first 2 (including the one on which is install fedora) are not in a raid array the last 2 are on a raid0 array no disks on the jmicron controller Steps to Reproduce: 1.dmraid -vay Actual results: [root@loozbox01 ~]# dmraid -vay /dev/sdd: "jmicron" and "isw" formats discovered (using isw)! *** glibc detected *** dmraid: malloc(): memory corruption: 0x000000000089cd00 *** ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib64/libc.so.6[0x3022a7b1cf] /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_malloc+0x98)[0x3022a7ca08] dmraid[0x40ffde] dmraid[0x40a94c] dmraid(free_raid_dev+0x25)[0x40aa75] dmraid[0x40b7ef] dmraid(discover_raid_devices+0xf3)[0x40d0d3] dmraid(lib_perform+0x17f)[0x40d2ef] dmraid(main+0x6e)[0x403f5e] /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe6)[0x3022a1e546] dmraid[0x403e29] ======= Memory map: ======== 00400000-00431000 r-xp 00000000 08:02 752230 /sbin/dmraid 00630000-00634000 rw-p 00030000 08:02 752230 /sbin/dmraid 0089b000-008bc000 rw-p 0089b000 00:00 0 [heap] 3021200000-3021220000 r-xp 00000000 08:02 253555 /lib64/ld-2.9.so 302141f000-3021420000 r--p 0001f000 08:02 253555 /lib64/ld-2.9.so 3021420000-3021421000 rw-p 00020000 08:02 253555 /lib64/ld-2.9.so 3022200000-3022239000 r-xp 00000000 08:02 253575 /lib64/libsepol.so.1 3022239000-3022439000 ---p 00039000 08:02 253575 /lib64/libsepol.so.1 3022439000-302243a000 rw-p 00039000 08:02 253575 /lib64/libsepol.so.1 3022600000-3022615000 r-xp 00000000 08:02 253831 /lib64/libdevmapper.so.1.02 3022615000-3022815000 ---p 00015000 08:02 253831 /lib64/libdevmapper.so.1.02 3022815000-3022817000 rw-p 00015000 08:02 253831 /lib64/libdevmapper.so.1.02 3022a00000-3022b68000 r-xp 00000000 08:02 253557 /lib64/libc-2.9.so 3022b68000-3022d68000 ---p 00168000 08:02 253557 /lib64/libc-2.9.so 3022d68000-3022d6c000 r--p 00168000 08:02 253557 /lib64/libc-2.9.so 3022d6c000-3022d6d000 rw-p 0016c000 08:02 253557 /lib64/libc-2.9.so 3022d6d000-3022d72000 rw-p 3022d6d000 00:00 0 3023200000-3023202000 r-xp 00000000 08:02 253791 /lib64/libdl-2.9.so 3023202000-3023402000 ---p 00002000 08:02 253791 /lib64/libdl-2.9.so 3023402000-3023403000 r--p 00002000 08:02 253791 /lib64/libdl-2.9.so 3023403000-3023404000 rw-p 00003000 08:02 253791 /lib64/libdl-2.9.so 3023e00000-3023e1a000 r-xp 00000000 08:02 253793 /lib64/libselinux.so.1 3023e1a000-3024019000 ---p 0001a000 08:02 253793 /lib64/libselinux.so.1 3024019000-302401a000 r--p 00019000 08:02 253793 /lib64/libselinux.so.1 302401a000-302401b000 rw-p 0001a000 08:02 253793 /lib64/libselinux.so.1 302401b000-302401c000 rw-p 302401b000 00:00 0 302e400000-302e416000 r-xp 00000000 08:02 253813 /lib64/libgcc_s-4.3.2-20081105.so.1 302e416000-302e616000 ---p 00016000 08:02 253813 /lib64/libgcc_s-4.3.2-20081105.so.1 302e616000-302e617000 rw-p 00016000 08:02 253813 /lib64/libgcc_s-4.3.2-20081105.so.1 7fdd8c000000-7fdd8c021000 rw-p 7fdd8c000000 00:00 0 7fdd8c021000-7fdd90000000 ---p 7fdd8c021000 00:00 0 7fdd91ee1000-7fdd91ee4000 rw-p 7fdd91ee1000 00:00 0 7fdd91ef7000-7fdd91efa000 rw-p 7fdd91ef7000 00:00 0 7fff99ee5000-7fff99efa000 rw-p 7ffffffea000 00:00 0 [stack] 7fff99fff000-7fff9a000000 r-xp 7fff99fff000 00:00 0 [vdso] ffffffffff600000-ffffffffff601000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0 [vsyscall] Abandon Additional info: Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/344215/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-11-28T20:24:00+00:00 Christophe wrote: Created attachment 325038 dmesg Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/344215/comments/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-11-29T13:50:34+00:00 Christophe wrote: I should have said that it worked without any pb on FC8 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/344215/comments/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-10T19:02:36+00:00 Heinz wrote: Christophe, can you please attach "dmraid -rD" output files (*.{dat,offset,size}) if possible in a bzip2/tarball here to allow me to try reproducing this with your data, thanks ? If dmraid failes for you, dd the last 4KB off each disk of the RAID set into files $DiskName.dat (e.g. sda.dat) and put the size in sectors into files $DiskName.size into the bzip2/tarball. There could be a HW (ie. RAM) flaw which gets triggered by optimizations in newer kernels. If possible, run memtest. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/344215/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-13T13:30:34+00:00 Christophe wrote: Created attachment 326815 output result of dmraid -rD Here are the ouput results of the dmraid -rD command. However, dmraid -rD ended with a segfault so I don't know if the output are as complete as you wished. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/344215/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2008-12-13T13:33:28+00:00 Christophe wrote: Could you please give me the command to run to retreive the last 4KB off each disk of the RAID using dd please? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/344215/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-01-09T12:23:50+00:00 Heinz wrote: find the size of each disk in sectors (say $sectors) and dd if=/dev/$DiskName skip=$((sectors - 8)) bs=512 of=$DiskName.dat for each $DiskName. Please don't forget to add $DiskName.size with the sectors count in. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/344215/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-01-11T18:45:22+00:00 Christophe wrote: Created attachment 328672 dd results here are the results of the dd command on the two disks in the raid0 array Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/344215/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-02-10T08:32:32+00:00 Luca wrote: I have the identical problem, my configuration is GIGABYTE P35-DS3R, 4GB RAM Fedora 10 x86_64 and two Seagate 1TB Disk in mirror on jmicron controller. If needs other infos ask for. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/344215/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-03T07:34:33+00:00 Giuseppe wrote: It sounds me as an old bug fixed in the previous release with dmraid-1.0.0.rc14-jmicron-name.patch[1] [1]http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/dmraid/dmraid-1.0.0.rc14 -jmicron-name.patch?revision=1.1&view=markup Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/344215/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-20T13:42:24+00:00 Giuseppe wrote: Created attachment 336048 Fix segfault when attempting to generate name for jmicron controllers Attached patch should fix this issue. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/344215/comments/17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-04-23T15:56:00+00:00 Christophe wrote: Thanks Giuseppe for the hint! It really seems related to jmicron controllers (my mother board hosts both jmicron and ICH9 controllers) because using the -f flag to specify to deal only with the ICH9/isw controller, everything seems OK dmraid -ay -f isw RAID set "isw_bgfiiahjia_Volume0" was activated RAID set "isw_bgfiiahjia_Volume0p1" was activated RAID set "isw_bgfiiahjia_Volume0p2" was activated RAID set "isw_bgfiiahjia_Volume0p3" was activated Ok, I could/should have tried before...if only I had read the man page more carefully. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/344215/comments/19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-11-18T09:02:54+00:00 Bug wrote: This message is a reminder that Fedora 10 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 10. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '10'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 10's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 10 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/344215/comments/20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-12-18T07:00:49+00:00 Bug wrote: Fedora 10 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-12-17. Fedora 10 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/344215/comments/21 ** Changed in: dmraid (Fedora) Importance: Unknown => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344215 Title: JMicron RAID controller segfaults when activating dmraid-rc15 (jaunty) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/344215/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
