Launchpad has imported 9 comments from the remote bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493578.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-04-02T10:41:39+00:00 Mihail wrote: when i type [root@myserver ~]# ss State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port ESTAB 0 0 10.1.0.12:ssh x.x.x.x:4172 ESTAB 0 0 10.1.0.12:mysql 10.1.0.11:34003 Segmentation fault [root@myserver ~]# When ipv6 is off close(4) = 0 open("/proc/net/tcp6", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) --- I try this on i386 and x86_64 and is the same error Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute/+bug/225573/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-04-02T10:47:42+00:00 Mihail wrote: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3475 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute/+bug/225573/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-04-07T09:27:26+00:00 Marcela wrote: *** Bug 493622 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute/+bug/225573/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-04-07T14:09:46+00:00 Marcela wrote: You can use for the meantime: "ss -f inet" After fixing previous problem "not showing all socket states" #446198 with upstream commit ab01dbbb94b8620c2bc85e30e107c3a9f0870a73 show up different bugs. On RHEL-5 machine could be seen this one, which could be fixed by upstream commit: 69cae645b28edbba53c8601ddeba01430e5e9da0 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute/+bug/225573/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-04-07T14:11:31+00:00 Marcela wrote: Created attachment 338509 Upstream commit git 69cae645b28edbba53c8601ddeba01430e5e9da0 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute/+bug/225573/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-06-08T22:14:23+00:00 Roberto wrote: In the function: static FILE *generic_proc_open(const char *env, const char *name) { char store[128]; const char *p = getenv(env); FILE *fp; if (!p) { p = getenv("PROC_ROOT") ? : "/proc"; snprintf(store, sizeof(store)-1, "%s/%s", p, name); p = store; } return fopen(p, "r"); } PROC_ROOT can be something longer than 128 and cause other segfault. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute/+bug/225573/comments/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-06-09T06:20:26+00:00 Marcela wrote: (In reply to comment #7) > In the function: > > static FILE *generic_proc_open(const char *env, const char *name) > { > char store[128]; > const char *p = getenv(env); > FILE *fp; > if (!p) { > p = getenv("PROC_ROOT") ? : "/proc"; > snprintf(store, sizeof(store)-1, "%s/%s", p, name); > p = store; > } > > return fopen(p, "r"); > } > > PROC_ROOT can be something longer than 128 and cause other segfault. If you have a reproducer for this problem, then please open a new bug. This is different problem. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute/+bug/225573/comments/11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-06-09T07:55:40+00:00 Roberto wrote: (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > In the function: > > > > static FILE *generic_proc_open(const char *env, const char *name) > > { > > char store[128]; > > const char *p = getenv(env); > > FILE *fp; > > if (!p) { > > p = getenv("PROC_ROOT") ? : "/proc"; > > snprintf(store, sizeof(store)-1, "%s/%s", p, name); > > p = store; > > } > > > > return fopen(p, "r"); > > } > > > > PROC_ROOT can be something longer than 128 and cause other segfault. > > If you have a reproducer for this problem, then please open a new bug. This is > different problem. I didn't see (i'm blind..) the snprintf out of bound comprobation and the segfault was produced because the content of PROC_ROOT was an invalid path (you fixed it in the last attachment). Sorry. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute/+bug/225573/comments/12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-10-21T11:04:45+00:00 errata-xmlrpc wrote: An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1520.html Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute/+bug/225573/comments/13 ** Changed in: iproute (CentOS) Importance: Unknown => Low ** Bug watch added: bugs.centos.org/ #3475 https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3475 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225573 Title: iproute: ss -u segfaults if ipv6 module is not loaded To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iproute/+bug/225573/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
