[...]
> Please note that the related open-vm-tools-desktop package also needs to be 
> kept at the same version as open-vm-tools.  As I mentioned we're using 
> VMware's "Horizon View" product so I require this also.
> Do I need to raise a bug against that package also?

The source package open-vm-tools which I thrown in a test backport
here builds all the binary packages you mentioned, so
open-vm-tools-desktop is already in the ppa.

>
> I linked open-vm-tools version 10.2.0 as it is the stable latest available.  
> My thinking is that if an update is necessary (and with the testing that 
> involves) why not go to the latest now?!

Sure eventually we might go for that.
But usually for any such work you'd not go ahead of the latest
available version - otherwise people upgrading from former Ubuntu
releases would downgrade the package.
For the current level of "giving it a try and evaluate" 10.1.15 is just as good.

>
> Could you please clarify this:
> "
> The maintainer scripts have not a lot (actually none) version dependent 
> special cases that sometimes wreaking havok for such backports.
> "

That mostly is a note to myself that there is not a lot of special
magic making these backports harder, sorry for being misleading.
TL;DR - Note: it has none of the bad stuff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741390

Title:
  Package two years out of date

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools/+bug/1741390/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to