I'm a bit confused about this, can anyone clarify? My interpretation is that mdeslaur is saying that because updates are in the normal ubuntu repositories, and in the sources.list files security.ubuntu.com is listed last, then so long as there is no problem with the archive repo, files will *not* be fetched from the security repo, and thus this change is unneeded.
Is this correct? The only case I can think of where this will cause more bandwidth is in the retrieval of a second set of package lists (from security.ubuntu.com), and the gap between packages being on security.ubuntu and the local archive mirror. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1438025 Title: please add security.ubuntu.com to the ubuntu mirrors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-cacher-ng/+bug/1438025/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
