The *binary* package names are default-jre*, default-jdk* and so on. Packages should not depend on particular openjdk versions anyway. I am more concerned to change a packaging schema having the major in the binary name for more than a decade just a few weeks before an LTS release. So no, I don't think that having the binary name change changed that short before release makes any sense.
With the proposal here you have binary packages with the expected name in the release (either in the release pocket for 8 and 9), or in the updates pocket (10 and 11). In the end the 10 packages can go away because we are able to remove them from the updates pocket. The 9 binary packages are not built from source anymore, and could be replaced by dummy (empty) packages in the updates pocket. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1758636 Title: openjdk-10 and -11 should only be released in the 18.04 LTS updates pocket To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-10/+bug/1758636/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
