Hi Steve, On 28 May 2018 at 22:47, Steve Langasek wrote: | This was going to be my recommended approach, as it's the authoritative | way to have a noninteractive install. I haven't had a chance to look | into the package yet given the holiday weekend. Do you think there is a | bug here that still warrants investigating, or do you think this was a | configuration regression on your side?
I have the feeling that one important variable setting may have gotten dropped at your end because if I look at my GH repo here: https://github.com/rocker-org/rocker/tree/master/r-apt you will see essentially identical Dockerfile setups that worked for precise trusty wily xenial yakkety zesty artful and then all of a sudden failed for bionic I will add the setting, but methinks you guys set it before. Or maybe one of the Debian packages involved did. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773687 Title: [bionic] no unattended installation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1773687/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
