This has been the advice since day 1. It's obviously not what many want. I'd expect that someone at Canonical might have a better chance at spurring communication between GRUB and BTRFS than a mere end-user.
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Lars Stockmann <736...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Note however the disadvantage of this: if you create a snapshot of your > btrfs system, the stuff in boot will not be included. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a > duplicate bug report (1152839). > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743 > > Title: > environment block not implemented on btrfs > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/grub/+bug/736743/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736743 Title: environment block not implemented on btrfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/grub/+bug/736743/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
