budgie-desktop appears to embed a full copy of caffeine. Is that necessary? Why can't it just depend on the archive version? If not, why not? And why isn't it renamed to a private namespace to avoid clashing, if it's necessary to have a private copy?
All of the above aside, you can't just randomly declare a versioned Breaks/Replaces on another package with random bogus made-up versions. A versioned Breaks/Replaces means "This other package is fixed to be able to coexist with mine as of version X", which is clearly BS here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786107 Title: budgie file conflict with caffeine To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/budgie-desktop/+bug/1786107/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
