> I have verified the fix with the latest stable jenkins release. > It was in fact changed and local libjni/jna is no longer required.
Great, thanks for the feedback. > Since the bug is fixed the only remaining question is if the handing > of the system.so approach is a good idea and I think that this might > not be the best place for this discussion. The debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=858876 has more visibility and an actual discussion going on about the system library rename, including pros and cons. > I think that closing this report would be appropriate. I have updated the status to Invalid. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1662813 Title: Libjna-jni uses wrong path on package installation on s390x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1662813/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
