Public bug reported: [Impact]
openjdk-9 introduced a few api changes that result in runtime errors when trying to run the java classes under openjdk 8 (or earlier) even when -source/-target are properly set. The fix is to build such code using the new openjdk-9 flag "--release" instead of the "-source/-target" pair. When running Cosmic's jtreg 4.2-b13-1 with agentvm under openjdk-8 it will fail and output a few lines such as: stderr: Exception: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError thrown from the UncaughtExceptionHandler in thread "main" The java.lang.NoSuchMethodError is actually caused by "java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.nio.ByteBuffer.flip()Ljava/nio/ByteBuffer" which can be easily solved by building jtreg with the "--release 7" argument. [Test Case] For this test case we need to create an empty TEST.ROOT file and a test class to satisfy jtreg requirements of a minimum test. jtreg must also be forced to use openjdk-8. $ sudo apt install openjdk-8-jdk jtreg $ touch TEST.ROOT $ cat > Hello.java << EOF /* * @test * @bug 2718282 * @summary Hello test */ public class Hello { public static void main(String [] args) throws Exception { if (true) System.out.println("Hello World!"); else throw new Exception("??"); } } EOF $ JT_JAVA=/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/ jtreg -va -agentvm Hello.java [2018-11-15 23:42:34,720] Agent[0]: stderr: [2018-11-15 23:42:34,721] Agent[0]: stderr: Exception: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError thrown from the UncaughtExceptionHandler in thread "main" -------------------------------------------------- TEST: Hello.java TEST JDK: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64 [snipped] Test results: error: 1 Report written to /tmp/JTreport/html/report.html Results written to /tmp/JTwork Error: Some tests failed or other problems occurred. The expected response from jtreg does not contain the "stderr:" lines as in: $ JT_JAVA=/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/ jtreg -va -agentvm Hello.java -------------------------------------------------- TEST: Hello.java TEST JDK: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64 [snipped] Test results: passed: 1 Report written to /tmp/JTreport/html/report.html Results written to /tmp/JTwork Alternatively one can also check that openjdk-lts is not affected by the change, it should output the same before and after the fix: $ sudo apt install openjdk-11-jdk $ JT_JAVA=/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64/ jtreg -va -agentvm Hello.java -------------------------------------------------- TEST: Hello.java TEST JDK: /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64 [snipped] Test results: passed: 1 Report written to /tmp/JTreport/html/report.html Results written to /tmp/JTwork [Regression Potential] 1. The --release argument is jdk9+ only, if jtreg is ever build with an older jdk it will FTBFS, so this change should only be backported on releases where the default-jdk is 9+. 2. The --release N argument is equivalent to setting -source N/-target N/-bootclasspath <N bootclasspath>, which can cause issues if the compiled classes use APIs that have been removed or are considered internal. The current jtreg version does not rely on internal classes from jdk 8 (otherwise it would FTBFS) but if a later version does that it will probably FTBFS - note that this is very unlikely as it would mean that upstream decided to break building jtreg with newer jdks. [Other Info] See https://github.com/apache/felix/pull/114 for a good overview on the methods that changed on OpenJDK 9 and a better description on the cause. Note that they propose patching the methods to cast ByteBuffer to Buffer when calling the affected methods, but this can be easily prevented by using the --release argument instead. ** Affects: jtreg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1803628 Title: jtreg fails due to api incompatibility with openjdk-9 or later To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jtreg/+bug/1803628/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs