> disruptiveness I'm talking about in terms of handling updates to the package, making it more cumbersome to handle and taking up the time/energy of reviewers, when a fast-moving experimental unfinished feature would be better maintained without that friction - allowing its developers to make any improvements they want with complete freedom.
> That doesn't have the same "easy to try" nor PR potential, it also can't be described as part of the release... You'll have to give instructions for how to enable it anyway, and in that case telling people how to enable a PPA is not much of an extra leap. I would think that the main PR value is "look at this cool feature that Ubuntu's engineers have done, and you can watch it getting better with each update", which you can get with a PPA. Feel free to get a second opinion if you aren't inclined to accept this one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1820850 Title: [FFe] Distro patch GNOME hi-dpi support for x11 sessions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1820850/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
