# Hello J T, Hi Rüdiger,
# I just resigned and kept using the HPIJS driver, which produces much better # (in terms of visually accurate) output. Exactly the same situation here. # However, Till Kamppeter says that Ubuntu is actively phasing out the HPIJS # driver. This means that the HPCUPS driver needs to be improved/fixed. I have the same opinion too. It is precisely *because* I read that hpijs was being "deprecated" that made me write in and post a comment to your bug report. (The hpijs driver produces good prints with my HP1100 - the hpcups driver, on the other hand, produces images that are completely unacceptable). I have spent an hour reading random HPLIP bug reports and their "resolutions" and as a result, I unfortunately do not hold out much hope that this bug will ever be resolved. While I would love to see the hpcups driver "fixed", I'll continue to use the hpijs driver in the meantime, and if nothing changes before the hpijs driver is "removed", I'll have to go and buy a non-HP printer. Fingers crossed... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036236 Title: hpcups and hpijs driver use different rasterization To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hplip/+bug/1036236/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
