> Although that works, its quite an hack. Can't we have something like > openjdk-8-jfx, > openjdk-8-jfx-source, openjdk-11-jfx, ...
It should possibly "just" be consistent. JavaFX *always* depends upon a particular JDK. Either make different versions of openjfx available for different openjdks (if there are different openjdk packages), or add *just* one openjdk and one openjfx package where it's easy to, say, downgrade openjd from 11 to 8 and be sure the installed openjfx package will either have a broken dependency or be downgraded as well. Current approach to handle this seems pretty much worst of both worlds. :| -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799946 Title: OpenJFX-11 does not work with OpenJDK-8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjfx/+bug/1799946/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
