(In reply to Wolfgang Jäger from comment #44) > (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #32 of 2016-01-13) > > It was correct in-between, so it is not the old bug. ... > > What version(s) did it correctly? May the quoted statement have been an > error? >
See comment 30 and bug 97111, after that back to staus quo inherited from OOo-- with some intervening improvements to accuracy of fitting the stretched bracketing glyphs into their node bounds. > Will the issue be addressed one day? Possibly, and you get notice of it here. > > Despite the fact that there isn't much mention of the 'Math' component in > forums I would assume that afflicted users (teachers e.g.) might be relevant > "agents" concerning the standing of free and open software. And? Teachers also are welcome to contribute source (as Regina does regularly) ;-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827695 Title: [Upstream] bug in displaying scalable square brackets in math object To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/827695/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
