This looks good, though this is quite a lot of code changes (and
refactoring) for a bug without a clear reproduction scenario. Would it
be possible to, along with the verification to be done by the reporting
person, perform some sanity runs to make sure the cancel/cleanup parts
of the code did not regress? Thanks!
** Changed in: pacemaker (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871166
Title:
lrmd crashes
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pacemaker/+bug/1871166/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
