Exactly @xnox - "These are static closed source fw data-files" Which implies we should all want a ack here on the bug (for an audit trail) by Security that they are ok to ship it that way.
Yes we have other packages that do that, but maybe there are special precautions or deals made with their blob provider - I want to see such an ack to be sure we are not bypassing something by accident. The only thing here, we want a "review of the case" not "a review of the code" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867813 Title: [MIR] linux-firmware-raspi2 to restricted To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware-raspi2/+bug/1867813/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
