> To support fixing other bugs in fwupd, libjcat needs to be upgraded to a newer release in focal
Please could you expand on this? Paraphrasing, this reads to me as equivalent to saying "we need to SRU this". This may be true, but merely stating this does not help me review whether an SRU is justified. If there is a specific bug or bugs needing this, please reference them at least. > [Regression Potential] > Little to none Please complete this section. > An upload of libjcat to focal-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "This is objectively not a "no change rebuild in focal" as claimed in the changelog.". What I mean is: this is deeply misleading. I understand you're adding a new entry on top of other entries that do explain the changes, but: 1) The upload didn't use -v to create a proper changes entry that covers the previous versions; and 2) even if it did, it's still misleading because a reader might think that you're not changing anything in Focal, even though you are. I suggest something like "Backport new version to Focal" instead, at a minimum. I usually try to avoid nitpicking/bikeshedding changelog texts, but I think this crosses the bar into being misleading and/or outright incorrect. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921547 Title: [SRU] Update libjcat to newer release for focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjcat/+bug/1921547/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
