I have to ask: Why wasn't the update reverted and not just withdrawn? Especially if it causes regressions I would have assumed that there is something like `2.31-0ubuntu9.3+really9.2` to be pushed into updates to allow for smooth transitions out of the broken version.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926918 Title: cannot install libc6-dev, requires old libc6 version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1926918/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
