On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 03:21:26PM -0000, Dan Streetman wrote: > Lucas, thanks! The naming sounds good to me, using -core and -extra does > seem better than supported/unsupported. No more concerns from me, so
I know it's cliche to bikeshed on names, but: - "core" is already an overloaded word with too many meanings - the apparmor project has had far too many people installing the apparmor-profiles-extra package without realizing the inconsistent quality of the profiles. I don't think "extra" conveys a strong enough feeling I suggest gstreamer's approach: -good, -bad, and -ugly. It's a bit coarse, maybe even rude, but I think it does a better job of answering the question "do I want to rely on this?" -supported imho gives a promise it can't keep: supported by whom? for how long? mint users or pop_OS users probably won't get support for this package from their respective communities, but -good -bad and -ugly still describes our impressions of a package's maturity and suitability for use. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927004 Title: [MIR] fence-agents To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fence-agents/+bug/1927004/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
