Ok. For clarity, my understanding of these patches are that they do the 
following things:
1) Add a feature to ModemManager to support uploading firmware to these modems
2) Increase a timeout that was found to be insufficient when doing a firmware 
update
3) Add a bunch of mappings from SIM->Carrier

And then in response to potential concerns:
(1) is a straight feature addition, and the associated code will only be called 
if an external component connects to modemmanager requesting a firmware upload. 
This is not expected to change any existing behaviours.
(2) is low-risk

It's not clear to me whether (3) is expected to change existing
behaviours at all.

Is this understanding correct?

Assuming (3) is not expected to change existing behaviour this looks
like it would be acceptable under the hardware-enablement SRU policy.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946096

Title:
  Support manual firmware upgrading for Foxconn and Quectel modems.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1946096/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to