I can confirm that just on the patch-level only two need backporting, the rest applies as is and I have regenerated them to match the packaging requirements. The backport-adaptations themselves are minimal.
From the content I guess it is complex enough that nobody can be fully sure. I'm still reading it ... Until then a few questions: - I wonder if we'd also want/need dc293f6 "scsi: fix sense code for EREMOTEIO" (to ensure this kind of ioerror gets to the guest as well) - what do you think? - I also wondered about 424740d "scsi-disk: do not complete requests early for rerror/werror=ignore" but we do not have 40dce4ee applied so that should be ok ** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967814 Title: Ubuntu 20.04.3 - ilzlnx3g1 - virtio-scsi devs on KVM guest having miscompares on disktests when there is a failed path. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1967814/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs