Dear Erich Thank you very much. I don't know if your target is closing things or something else, but... Ignoring information, that release has got energy problems on generic hardware, ideally confirms, what's the quality. I don't know which package(s) is/are responsible for that, but in normal situation somebody could at least ask for more info or something. I don't know also what should be CPU usage (100%?), that could allow assigning it to bug category, but generally it's very bad from quality perspective, that it's ignored. Shame. I liked Ubuntu.
With kind regards Marcin Wiacek On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, 19:40 Erich Eickmeyer , <1970...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Thank you for taking the time to report this issue and helping to make > Ubuntu better. Examining the information you have given us, this does > not appear to be a bug report so we are closing it and converting it to > a question in the support tracker. We understand the difficulties you > are facing, but it is better to raise problems you are having in the > support tracker at https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu if you are > uncertain if they are bugs. You can also find help with your problem in > the support forum of your local Ubuntu community http://loco.ubuntu.com/ > or asking at https://askubuntu.com or https://ubuntuforums.org. For help > on reporting bugs, see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs. > > ** Changed in: ubuntu > Status: New => Invalid > > ** Converted to question: > https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/701493 > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970036 > > Title: > Ubuntu 22.04 much worse in energy saving than 21.10 > > Status in Ubuntu: > Invalid > > Bug description: > My laptop was updated from 21.10 to 22.04 and has got much worse > battery work time (even about 30% or more). Standard Intel 11-gen with > integrated graphic, no external devices. Nothing special. > > I'm looking into System Monitor and it looks, new release has various > processes, which are started quite regurarly and are enabling various > CPU cores. CPU usage is not high, but because it's regular and not > done on one core... well, it leads me to question - was somebody even > started thinking about it? Or just upgraded everything and was happy, > that it's working? > > First of all it could be good to start something on next CPU cores > only, when previous one are too busy. I know, it's kernel scheduler > thing. Big problem. > > About processes in idle mode (no keyboard and touchpad pressing, no > usb devices, no network, no sound playing, no camera enabled, nothing > started, really only desktop): > > Xorg and gnome-shell - always doing something (+ shell is saving and > reading a lot from disk, which increases power usage too) > > systemd-oomd - really? Started regularly, when I have even 20% RAM > used. There should be trigger saying "use it only when for example 80% > RAM is used" > > i915_flip - don't know what do to with that. Have only laptop screen > > snap-store and network manager - don't have network in this moment. > Really need to run it regurarly? it should be started, when network is > on > > gsd-housekeeping - very often > > snapd - even when I don't do anything > > pulse - even when I don't have sound > > update-notifier - what? even without network? this should be called > only, when normal updates are checked... and when I set "check for > updates daily" it should be called once a day only (or when network is > connected and last check was done more than 24 h ago) > > I could give even much longer list and I could say "this is absolute > normal", but... 21.10 was much better. Could somebody take any device > and just start doing something about it ? CPU usage with spikes up to > 20% in idle mode is not normal (earlier my powertop was showing about > 50 events, now standard is 150 or 200) > > Additionally it's not possible to enable automatic suspend in time > shorter than 15 minutes. Why? Why? Why? > > PS. with development experience > 20 years I see, that somebody really > haven't looked on it from higher perspective (and now there is > required some project, in which it will be checked, how things are > working together). > > PS2. well, this problem makes, that I need either to downgrade or move > to other distribution. And to clarify - I'm of course using various > power saving settings, like profile, etc. (installation and strategy > related to both versions are the same) > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1970036/+subscriptions > > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970036 Title: Ubuntu 22.04 much worse in energy saving than 21.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1970036/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
