> The version number for the package also looks wrong still. Yes, because for now I am submitting the patch I am generating from the build I submit to my PPA to test. I will fix this once everything is done.
> Are you intentionally populating LIBRARY_STATIC with a path to a *shared* library? Yes, this is done intentionally because AFAIU the static lib is not supposed to be used by consumers of libtraceevent (and could even not be included in the package). So I thought it best to build the test binary using the installed shared library. But I may totally be wrong on that so if using the static one is fine I can fix it! > I would write your changelog entry along the lines of Yes, good point, it looks much better! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051916 Title: [MIR] promote libtraceevent as a trace-cmd dependency To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtraceevent/+bug/2051916/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
