> Why, when this is an upstream release for which Canonical is the
upstream, are there local Debian patches included here?

Good point, we started the SRU process after 4.7.0 was released, but the
time it took us to test the PPA and then the beginning of the patch
pilot the noble released a minor version was released. We can do the new
release, if that is preferred, but there were still patches that needed
to be added for both noble and oracular due to the fact we only started
testing dev release recently, and we discovered the issues, and the
corresponding fixes. So, we'll see 2 patches for oracular and 1 for
noble. If that is ok, then I can re-issue a new debdiff.

Alternatively, 4.7.2 is due to be released soon, which will have the
relevant fixes included.

On the changelog items, I was following the previous maintainers, and
didn't add the extra details. But, I am more than happy to change this
here moving forward.

The "X-Python3-Versiom: >= 3.6" was added, as that is the version of
python sos supports, and hence wanted to make that as a soft
requirement. This would then change later in the year. But, if you think
this is better added for the relevant series that we need to do this,
like bionic, then happy to change it in that manner. We do plan to SRU
for bionic, as that has caused a corner case of upgrade from xenial to
bionic in the corresponding LP

Thanks for the "Suggests: python3-boto3" comment, happy to remove that,
if it's pointless, was not 100% sure on. On noble, we now going to add
that to Depends as this package is in main. I can add that on, and the
reasoning.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054395

Title:
  [sru] sos upstream 4.7.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-pro/+bug/2054395/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to