Public bug reported:

    mlx5 has a built in self-test at driver startup to evaluate if the
    platform supports write combining to generate a 64 byte PCIe TLP or
    not. This has proven necessary because a lot of common scenarios end up
    with broken write combining (especially inside virtual machines) and there
    is other way to learn this information.

    This self test has been consistently failing on new ARM64 CPU
    designs (specifically with NVIDIA Grace's implementation of Neoverse
    V2). The C loop around writeq() generates some pretty terrible ARM64
    assembly, but historically this has worked on a lot of existing ARM64 CPUs
    till now.

    We see it succeed about 1 time in 10,000 on the worst effected
    systems. The CPU architects speculate that the load instructions
    interspersed with the stores makes the WC buffers statistically flush too
    often and thus the generation of large TLPs becomes infrequent. This makes
    the boot up test unreliable in that it indicates no write-combining,
    however userspace would be fine since it uses a ST4 instruction.

    Further, S390 has similar issues where only the special zpci_memcpy_toio()
    will actually generate large TLPs, and the open coded loop does not
    trigger it at all.

    Fix both ARM64 and S390 by switching to __iowrite64_copy() which now
    provides architecture specific variants that have a high change of
    generating a large TLP with write combining. x86 continues to use a
    similar writeq loop in the generate __iowrite64_copy().

** Affects: linux-nvidia (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071655

Title:
  PR for:  "IB/mlx5: Use __iowrite64_copy() for write combining stores"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-nvidia/+bug/2071655/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to