You could have fixed the test plan as I requested instead of complaining? FYI, you can find the upload in the rejected queue. The SRU team can even accept from the rejected queue. It should be minimal work to do this.
On the other hand the current SRU workflow requires SRU team members to continually re-check to see if uploaders have fixed issues mentioned, so I tend to reject uploads that haven't received attention from the SRU driver in over a month. Soon after I joined the SRU team I asked the question and was told that it was OK to reject for this reason, without a delay at all. I would like to improve the workflow so that this isn't necessary, but that's how it is at the moment. > I'm sure you are very well aware we're still starting a broader process on these uploads to enable frame pointers, and we shouldn't work against that. That isn't relevant. This is important work and can make progress as soon as you start responding appropriately to review feedback. But you don't seem to have done that? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076419 Title: lxml: Does not respect compiler flags To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxml/+bug/2076419/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
