> You also don't seem fully convinced [1]. Yeah; it's a balancing with the Ubuntu release around the corner.
> I am not approving this FFe for now, but I'm open for further discussion if you think I didn't fully get why it is important to have fwupd 2.1.x in Resolute. I don't feel any of those features are crucial for resolute. The main reason to consider it would be that the EoL date for 2.1.x is further out (https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/security/policy) and thus it becomes "easier" to support in an LTS release. Secondary reasons to support are a giant list of more supported hardware and bug fixes. I won't copy and paste all of them here, but you can see at this link the bullets that describe this. https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/releases/tag/2.1.1 The risks associated with the bump are of course regressions. Upstream has an emulation test suite that simulates updates on a lot of devices though, so this is less risky than it has been in the past. I will also say that at least from an upstream hat the release has been out for two weeks, and no one has complained. When there are major regressions, the faster moving distros (IE Arch, Rawhide and Gentoo) have very vocal complaints in days. --- Note: I'm not arguing one way or the other, just trying to provide all information for this decision. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2146332 Title: [FFe] Migrate to fwupd 2.1.1 release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/2146332/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
