On 1/20/08, DanaGoyette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, it seems like the only thing being marked as 'invalid' is the > 'boinc' assignment; the 'linux' assignment seems to have mysteriously > been replaced by the confusing statement: "This bug is not recorded as > needing to be fixed in linux (Ubuntu). <Also Needs Fixing Here>" > > I sure hope it is being left as valid for 'linux'; the behavior feels > like a regression subjectively, even if there is a good reason behind > it. >
Hi, This is not a regression. Ubuntu is configuring the kernel with CONFIG_FAIR_USER_SCHED, which changes the behaviour. You can utilize the feature more effectivly with uevent scripts (to which I have linked in an earlier comment) CONFIG_FAIR_CGROUP_SCHED will allow finer control of group scheduling, with the option not to use by not making any groups and putting everything in just one group. Thanks, Dhaval [I seem to be missing something, I've marked the bug as invalid, does that mean something other than this bug is not a bug?] -- 2.6.24-2: Regression with idle cpu cycle handling https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177713 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
